Does anybody know why we do what we do? Why do we wake up everyday and go to our workplaces? It seems that the most obvious reason is money. We need money to function in the society. We need some funds to make some plans, if you wish.
It turns out that not only money motivate people to do their job. OSS is the proof. Well, yes, we can make money from open source projects. And a lot of companies do this already, but it's not the point. The point is that there is another force motivating people. Most good programmers like some of my colleagues and buddies work not because of money, but because they feel passion to write programs. Money is a required but not sufficient part of motivation.
Daniel H. Pink some time ago gave an excellent talk about motivation factors and how to use them in work process.
Some companies, like Atlassian, show outstanding results in the process of self organizing their employees. They simply said to their developers:
next 24 hours you could do whatever you want with whoever you want, but you should show results to the company within next 24 hours.
Looks familiar, right? Yes, it's some sort of Google's 20% culture.
Nevertheless, so called FedEx days was born (like FedEx Ground day-definite delivery, I believe):
Overall, I'd say we did pretty damn well. People built some kick ass projects, we all learnt about new technologies, and everyone seemed to have a good time.
[...]
Will we repeat the exercise? Definitely. I think it was great thing to do - developers got to play, exercise their minds a little, build some fun stuff and learn about new technologies.
There are a lot of really fun things provided by Atlassian FedExes. Which makes me believe in the words if Daniel Pink:
Pay people enough to take the issue of money off the table.
There is no need to pay people more that that. Instead of raising salary you would better invest more aggressively in creating an attractive and efficient work environment. If you work in a IT company give your team some time to share experience and thoughts about new technologies, provide really good hardware for your employees (it's so cheap anyway), and, holy crap, do not ever shape an Internet connection. I mean it, never.
The idea became clear to me after a few times I watched videos with the guy. If the work doesn't involve any rudimentary cognitive skills then the higher it is paid the better it is done, otherwise it works the opposite way. And if it does people work better when the money question is off and they can work to make some progress in the area. But this is how it works, so it's the economist's point of view. Does he have anything for 2 'other' and I guess most important sides of the problem - call them the company and the employee. It is up to employee's system of values though, but what the company is able to do? Allow it's workers to do anything they want, introduce 20% culture? There could be some problems involved. This sort of questions remain unresolved to me as I think of motivation, because it has practical appliance, it's not just a theory.
ОтветитьУдалитьI agree with you. It absolutely has practical appliance. Every company should have to decide which motivation scheme will be applied. And how to do it depends entirely on company culture and history.
ОтветитьУдалить